武则天什么星座| 3e是什么意思| 什么什么团结| 玉的主要成分是什么| 意字五行属什么| 甲氨蝶呤是什么药| 什么食物高蛋白含量高| 专员是什么职位| 什么是幼小衔接| 梦见别人穿红衣服是什么意思| xo酱是什么酱| 媾是什么意思| 什么可以吃| h代表什么意思| 晚上吃什么水果对身体好| 脑供血不足是什么原因引起的| 脸发麻是什么病的前兆| 四季豆为什么叫四季豆| X-Ray什么意思| 火象是什么意思| 什么颜色招财并聚财| 心衰吃什么药效果最好| 电轴不偏是什么意思| 阿胶补血口服液适合什么人喝| 左手中指痛什么预兆| 漫谈是什么意思| 9月是什么星座| 过期牛奶有什么用途| 血管属于什么组织| 癔症是什么意思| 己五行属什么| 心电图诊断窦性心律什么意思| 一度房室传导阻滞是什么意思| 下午7点是什么时辰| 绿茶属于什么茶| 毫无违和感什么意思| 非萎缩性胃炎伴糜烂吃什么药| 舌头无苔是什么原因| 蓄谋已久什么意思| 牙齿发黄是什么原因| 湘女多情是什么意思| 首台套是什么意思| 康熙叫什么名字| 小孩吃火龙果有什么好处| 牙槽骨吸收是什么意思| 空调为什么要加氟| 医保卡是什么| 大雄宝殿供奉的是什么佛| 软肋骨炎吃什么药对症| 为什么一进去就软了| 木耳中毒什么症状| 樱桃补什么| 喉咙干咳吃什么药| 王昆念什么| 与什么隔什么| 4像什么| 虱子用什么药可以根除| 完蛋是什么意思| 慰藉是什么意思| 猫摇尾巴是什么意思| 血沉偏高说明什么| 流鼻血是什么原因引起的| 墨西哥人是什么人种| 胃烧心吃什么食物好| image是什么意思| hov是什么意思| 强硬是什么意思| 子宫肌瘤是什么原因导致的| 什么星座黑化最吓人| 眼睛出血是什么原因| 止境是什么意思| 中国最好的大学是什么大学| 群体是什么意思| 折耳猫是什么| 身上有白点是什么原因| 玫瑰花茶和什么搭配好| 7到9点是什么时辰| hdl是什么意思| 鱼油什么人不能吃| 增生性贫血是什么意思| 肝气郁结吃什么药| hcg低有什么补救的办法| 为什么长痣越来越多了| 只是女人容易一往情深是什么歌| 疼风是什么原因引起的| 荨麻疹是由什么引起的| viomi是什么牌子| 准备要孩子需要注意什么| 女生安全期是什么意思| 义字少一点念什么| 胃炎吃什么药效果最好| 哀鸿遍野是什么意思| 十二生肖本领强是什么生肖| 感觉有痰咳不出来是什么原因| 生气发抖是什么原因| 轰趴是什么意思| 什么字最难写| 不服是什么意思| 舌自心念什么| 嫩牛五方什么意思| 查脂肪肝挂什么科室| 景泰蓝是什么| 绝情是什么意思| 热量的单位是什么| 灰配什么颜色好看| doosan挖掘机是什么牌子| 小腹一直疼是什么原因| 名字是什么意思| cd3cd4cd8都代表什么| 锦鲤什么意思| 肝红素高是什么原因| 生物技术专业学什么| 阴唇肿是什么原因| 树莓色是什么颜色| 头晕挂什么科室| 地瓜不能和什么一起吃| 六爻小说讲的什么| 碧玺是什么| epo是什么意思| 什么的技术| 己未五行属什么| 2013属什么生肖| 大葱和小葱有什么区别| 9月11号是什么星座| 反哺是什么意思| 拍手腕中间有什么好处| 2008年什么年| 什么泡酒让性功能最强| 糯米是什么米| 小月子是什么意思| 虚热吃什么药| 为什么老是放屁| 什么是主动脉夹层| 中国的八大菜系是什么| 肠绞痛什么原因引起的| 心安是什么意思| 肩周炎是什么症状| 羽毛球拍什么牌子好| npn是什么意思| 久咳不愈是什么原因| 头皮痛是什么原因| 胎心监护是检查什么| 猫弓背什么意思| 冒昧打扰是什么意思| 伤官配印是什么意思| 牛吃什么| 人体由什么组成| 制片人是做什么的| 佝偻病是什么样子图片| 临床医生是什么意思| 开业送什么礼物好| 梦见黄瓜是什么意思| 清华大学前身叫什么| 皮牙子是什么意思| 什么牌子的手机好| 为什么蚊子咬了会起包| 大便很粗是什么原因| 牙垢是什么| 10.25是什么星座| 市委副秘书长什么级别| 什么是阻生智齿| 广西三月三是什么节日| 甲状腺是什么症状| 爱马仕为什么要配货| 生姜什么时候种| 历年是什么意思| 吃什么排铜最快| 临床医学专业学什么| 贴水是什么意思| 经常想吐恶心是什么原因| 妇科支原体是什么病| 菜花病是什么| 金色配什么颜色好看| 多囊卵巢综合症是什么| 男士圆脸适合什么发型| 性病有什么症状| 乌龟为什么不吃东西| 什么花好看| 陈晓和赵丽颖为什么分手| 减肥晚上适合吃什么水果| 喝姜粉有什么好处| 梦见洗澡是什么意思| 小便带血是什么原因| 深度水解奶粉是什么意思| 自食恶果是什么意思| 冰冻三尺非一日之寒什么意思| mild是什么意思| 1979属什么| 头晕是什么毛病| c肽测定是什么意思| 肛塞有什么作用| 脾喜欢什么食物| 百无一用是什么意思| 腚什么意思| 病理报告是什么意思| 痛风在医院挂什么科| 4月23日是什么星座| 玉米须泡水喝有什么功效| 银屑病是什么| 嗓子疼咳嗽挂什么科| 乳腺癌什么症状| 霜花店讲了什么故事| 拉肚子喝什么水| 食管息肉的症状是什么| 水痘长什么样| 梅花鹿吃什么食物| 塞飞洛是什么档次的包| 为什么不能在一起| 胎监是检查什么的| 薄幸是什么意思| 算了吧什么意思| 情投意合是什么意思| 阻滞是什么意思| 肝郁气滞吃什么药好| 肺部玻璃结节是什么病| 眼镜发明之前眼镜蛇叫什么| 眉头有痣代表什么| 上帝叫什么名字| 右侧中耳乳突炎是什么意思| blackpink什么意思| 全身发烫但不发烧是什么原因| 梦见自己得绝症了是什么预兆| 猥琐是什么意思| 大熊猫属于什么科| iv医学上什么意思| ucs是什么意思| 人总放屁是什么原因| 八月十四是什么星座| 孩子第一次来月经要注意什么| 猪身上红疙瘩用什么药| 进是什么结构| 锋芒的意思是什么| 为什么牙齿晚上痛白天不痛| 外翻是什么意思| 肠胃挂什么科| 左眉毛跳是什么预兆| 解脲支原体阳性吃什么药最好| 低密度脂蛋白偏高是什么意思| 古驰属于什么档次| 什么皮肤病会传染| 脸痒是什么原因| 贫血吃什么药| 蜘蛛怕什么| 菊花茶有什么功效| 旦是什么意思| 血压偏低是什么原因| 秫米是什么米| 反胃恶心想吐吃什么药| 十月份生日是什么星座| 办护照需要什么材料| 山海经讲的是什么| 神经纤维瘤挂什么科| 大德是什么意思| 浮萍是什么意思| 固执的人是什么性格| 生理期是什么意思| 为什么会甲亢| 血糖低什么症状| 什么是地包天牙齿图片| 下眼睑浮肿是什么原因| 视角是什么意思| 什么茶对胃好| 茯茶是什么茶| 蜈蚣最怕什么| 百度Jump to content

想远离喧嚣 就来重庆这些水乡古镇走走吧(1)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
German prisoners fill puddles at Recklinghausen internment camp
百度 在制造方面,SF公司完成了中美两地双制造基地整体布局。

Disarmed Enemy Forces (DEF, less commonly,[1] Surrendered Enemy Forces) is a US designation for soldiers who surrender to an adversary after hostilities end, and for those POWs who had already surrendered and were held in camps in occupied German territory at the time.[2] It was General Dwight D. Eisenhower's designation of German prisoners in post–World War II occupied Germany.[3]

Because of the logistical difficulties of feeding all of the nearly two million of surrendered German soldiers at the levels required by the Geneva Convention during the food crisis of 1945,[4] the purpose of the designation, along with the British designation of Surrendered Enemy Personnel (SEP), was to prevent categorization of the prisoners as prisoners of war (POW) under the 1929 Geneva Convention.

Germany at the end of the war

[edit]

Food and agriculture in Nazi Germany had declined greatly in 1944 and 1945. Germany had mobilized for total war, and food for the troops and war workers was vital to the war.[5] A shortage of synthetic fertilizers had developed after nitrogen and phosphate stocks were channeled into ammunition (explosives) production,[5][6] and much of the potato crop was requisitioned to produce ethanol fuel for the military's V-2 arsenal. Consequently, crop levels had fallen by 20% to 30% at the end of the war.[5][7] Allied bombing raids had destroyed thousands of farm buildings, and rendered food processing facilities inoperable.[5][6] Lack of farm machinery, spare parts, and fertilizer caused an almost total disruption of agriculture when the war was over.[5][7] After the release of Ostarbeiters, slave laborers that were Soviet POWs and Eastern Europeans, extreme agriculture labor shortages existed that could be relieved only by German DEFs and SEPs.[5][7] Roving bands of displaced persons and returning soldiers and civilians decimated the hog herds and chicken flocks of German farmers.[5][7]

The destroyed German transportation infrastructure created additional logistical difficulties, with railroad lines, bridges, canals and terminals left in ruins.[8] The turnaround time for railroad wagons was five times higher than the prewar average.[8][9] Of the 15,600 German locomotives, 38.6% were no longer operating and 31% were damaged.[8] Only 1,000 of the 13,000 kilometers of track in the British zone were operable.[8] Urban centers often had to be supplied with horse-drawn carriages and wheeled carts.[5]

By May 8, 1945, the Allies had become responsible for the health and wellbeing of 7 million displaced persons in Germany and 1.6 million in Austria, including slave laborers from all over Europe.[10][11] Soon thereafter, German populations had swollen by 12 to 14.5 million ethnic Germans expelled from Eastern Europe by the Soviet Union.[12] Bavarian villages in the American zone faced 15% to 25% population increases from displaced persons, with Munich alone having to deal with 75,000 displaced persons.[12]

The worst dislocation of agriculture was caused by the German zonal partitions, which cut off Western Germany from its "breadbasket" of farm lands east of the Oder-Neisse line that had accounted for 35% of Germany's prewar food production,[5] and which the Yalta Conference had given to Poland to compensate for lands of Eastern Poland.[5] The Soviet Union, with millions of its own starving citizens at home, was not willing to distribute this production to the population in western Germany.[13] In January 1945, the basic German ration was 1,625 calories/day, and that was further reduced to 1,100 calories by the end of the war in the British zone, and remained at that level into the summer, with levels varying from 840 calories/day in the Ruhr to 1,340 calories/day in Hamburg.[13] The situation was no better in the American zones of Germany and Austria.[13]

These problems combined to create severe shortages across Germany. One summary report estimated that just prior to Victory in Europe (V-E) Day, German consumer daily caloric intake was only 1,050, and that after V-E Day it dropped to 860 calories per day, though actual estimates are confusing because of the wide variation by location and because unofficial estimates were usually higher.[14] It was clear by any measure that, by the spring of 1945, the German population was existing on rations that would not sustain life in the long term.[14] A July 1945 CCAC report stated that "the food situation in western Germany is perhaps the most serious problem of the occupation. Average consumption is now about one third below the general accepted subsistence level of 2000 calories per day."[15]

In the spring of 1946 the International Red Cross was finally allowed to provide limited amounts of food aid to prisoners of war in the U.S. occupation zone.[16] By June 1948, DEF rations had been increased to 1990 calories and in December 1949 rationing was effectively discontinued and the food crisis was over.[17]

Number of surrenders in World War II

[edit]

Approximately 35 million POWs were taken in World War II, 11 million of them Germans.[10][18] In addition to 20 million dislocated citizens, the U.S. Army had to cope with most of the surrendered German military forces.[19] While the Allies had anticipated 3 million surrendering Germans, the actual total was as many as 5 million in American hands by June 1945 out of 7.6 million in northwestern Europe alone, not counting the 1.4 million in Allied hands in Italy.[19] Approximately 1 million were Wehrmacht soldiers fleeing west to avoid capture by the Red Army.[19]

The number of Germans surrendering to U.S. forces shot up from 313,000 by the end of the first quarter of 1945, to 2.6 million by April 1945, and more than 5 million in May.[4][20][21] By April 1945, entire German Army groups were surrendering, which overwhelmed Allied shipping such that German prisoners could no longer be sent to POW camps in America after March 1945.[22] According to a June 22, 1945, announcement by the Allies, a total of 7,614,914 prisoners (of all designations) were held in French, British and American camps.[23]

Although the British and Americans agreed to split the western Germans who surrendered,[23] the British recanted arguing that they "did not have places to keep them or men to guard them on the continent, and that moving them to England would arouse public resentment and adversely affect British morale."[24] By June 1, 1945, Eisenhower reported to the War Office that this refusal produced shortages in the 25 million prisoner-day rations which were growing at the rate of 900,000 prisoner-day rations.[24][25] Feeding this number of people became a logistical nightmare for SHAEF, which frequently had to resort to improvisation.[24]

Early considerations of DEF designations

[edit]

Regarding the adherence to the Geneva Convention for vanquished Germans, Churchill at the Casablanca Conference in 1943 summed up the Allies’ "unconditional surrender" policy with "If we are bound, we are bound by our consciences to civilization."[26] In prosecuting the war, SHAEF carried out the decisions of the Combined (Anglo-American) Chiefs of Staff (CCS).[27] They had to execute the directives of the European Advisory Commission (EAC), which included the Soviet Union.[27] The CCS and EAC directives implemented policies of the heads of government who decided the most important questions of Allied occupation policy.[27] After the EAC was set up by the 1943 Moscow Conference, it drafted the instruments of unconditional surrender.[26] During the EAC debates the Allies determined that they could strip the Germans of all government, including their protection by international law, and be free to punish them without restriction.[26][28] The Geneva Convention (GC) required SHAEF to feed German POWs a ration equal to its own base soldiers.[4]

The original discussion of the Allies treating post-Victory in Europe (V-E) Day prisoners of war as something other than those protected by the Geneva Convention had its vague origins in the Casablanca Conference, but it was given specific form by the EAC in the summer of 1944 in a "draft instrument of surrender" given to the American government.[29] The instrument required the surrendering German commander to accept that his men "shall at the discretion of the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the Allied State concerned be declared to be Prisoners of War."[30] Several factors went into this consideration, including that the EAC member the Soviet Union refused to sign the Geneva Conventions, despite intense pressure from 1942 onward to sign the document.[31] Behind the Soviets' refusal were a number of considerations closely linked with the regime, but a major consideration that emerged at the Tehran Conference was that Soviet leader Joseph Stalin desired four million German laborers for an "indefinite period", perhaps for life.[31] The Soviets' refusal to even consider signing the GC created great problems for the EAC, including the fact that a single surrender instrument could not be drafted if a Soviet commander taking the surrender could not possibly commit his government to accord GC rights to prisoners.[31] As a result, the EAC instruments promised nothing in that regard, employed awkward and tortured language and made plain the premeditated Allied evasion of the Geneva Convention.[31] In addition, other Allies also considered using Germans for prison labor, which the Germans themselves had already required of prisoners they had held during the war.[32] Later EAC documents described the "Disabled Enemy Forces".[30]

DEF and SEP designations

[edit]

With regard to food requirements, regardless of the reasoning or GC legal requirements, SHAEF was simply not capable of feeding all of the millions of German prisoners at the level of Allied base soldiers because of the high numbers and lack of resources. This was not deliberate policy, but the result of wartime damage to the infrastructure, which created the difficult problem of feeding the defeated peoples without it.[4] In a March 10, 1945, cable to the CCS, Eisenhower requested permission for this designation per the earlier EAC documents, and was granted such permission.[30] When the CCS approved Eisenhower's March 1945 request, it added that prisoners after Victory in Europe (V-E Day) should not be declared "Prisoners of War" under the Geneva Convention because of the lack of food.[33]

The CCS then cabled British Field Marshal Sir Harold Alexander, supreme Allied Commander in the Mediterranean, suggesting that the same steps be taken regarding the German surrenders in Austria, and then approved Alexander's similar request for a DEF designation, stating "in view of the difficulties regarding food and accommodation, it was so decided."[33] Eisenhower's JCS superiors ordered him to change German POWs' designation to "disarmed enemy forces" (DEF), just as British chiefs had done, redesignating their prisoners "Surrendered Enemy Personnel" (SEP).[4] Alexander then requested that the CCS let British forces use such a designation for the surrender of German forces in Italy, the CCS granted his request and the conditions of such surrenders to British commander General Sir William D. Moran almost prevented the surrenders from occurring for worried German troops.[32] The CCS submitted the DEF designations for study to the Combined Civilian Affairs Committee (CCAC), which not only concurred with the designation, but went further, suggesting that the status of all German POWs be retroactively lifted after the German surrender.[34]

By June 22, 1945, of the 7,614,914 prisoners (of all designations) held in British and American camps, 4,209,000 were soldiers captured before the German capitulation and considered "POWs".[23] This leaves approximately 3.4 million DEFs and SEPs, who according to Allied agreements, were supposed to be split between Britain and the United States.[23] As of June 16, 1945, the U.S., France, and the U.K. held a combined total of 7,500,000 German POWs and DEFs. By June 18, the U.S. had discharged 1,200,000 of these.[35]

Aftermath

[edit]

After the DEF designations were made in the early summer of 1945, the International Red Cross was not permitted to fully involve itself in the situation in camps containing German prisoners (POWs, DEFs or SEPs), some of which initially were Rheinwiesenlager transit camps, and even though conditions in them gradually improved, "even the most conservative estimates put the death toll in French camps alone at over 16,500 in 1945".[36]

The Geneva Convention was amended. Articles 6 and 7 of the Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Geneva July 27, 1929, had covered what may and may not be done to a prisoner on capture. The wording of the 1949 Third Geneva Convention was intentionally altered from that of the 1929 convention so that soldiers who "fall into the power" following surrender or mass capitulation of an enemy are now protected as well as those captured in the course of fighting.[37][38]

Most captives of the Americans and the British were released by the end of 1948, and most of those in French and Soviet captivity were released by the end of 1949, although the last big release occurred in 1956. According to the section of the German Red Cross dealing with tracing the captives, the ultimate fate of 1,300,000 German POWs in Allied custody (mostly American) is still unknown; they are still officially listed as missing.[39]

Historical precedents

[edit]

After defeating Poland in 1939, and Yugoslavia two years later, many troops from those nations were "released" from POW status by Nazi Germany and turned into a "virtual conscript labor force".[36]

Germany had either broken up or absorbed the countries in question, and the German argument was that neither country remained as a recognized state to which the POWs could still claim to belong, and that since belonging to a recognized nation was a formal prerequisite for POW status, "former Polish and Yugoslav military personnel were not legally prisoners of war".[36][40]

The Allied argument for retracting Geneva convention protection from the German soldiers was similar to that of Nazi Germany vis à vis Polish and Yugoslav soldiers; using the "disappearance of the Third Reich to argue that the convention no longer operated-that POW status did not apply to the vast majority who had passed into captivity on and after May 5".[36] The motive was twofold: both an unwillingness to follow the Geneva convention now that the threat of German reprisals against Allied POWs was gone, and also they were "to an extent unable to meet the high standards of the Geneva code" for the large number of captured Germans.[36]

Following the surrender of Italy to the Allies in September 1943, German forces took around one million Italian military personnel prisoner. These personnel were designated "Italian military internees" and not granted the rights of POWs under the Geneva Conventions, as the German government claimed that they were not POWs as the two countries had not been at war. This continued, despite Italy’s subsequent declaration of war on Germany on October 13, 1943.[41] Approximately 600,000 of the captured Italians were subsequently transported to Germany and required to work as forced labourers in generally harsh conditions.[42][43]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Note: it is said for German troops in Northern Italy, not to be confused with its British equivalent, "Surrendered Enemy Personnel".
  2. ^ In April, the War Department approved treating all members of the German armed forces captured after the declaration of ECLIPSE conditions or the cessation of hostilities, and all prisoners of war not evacuated from Germany immediately after the conclusion of hostilities, as "disarmed enemy forces", and specified that such captives would be responsible for feeding and maintaining themselves. The ruling did not apply to war criminals, wanted individuals, and security suspects, who were to be imprisoned, fed, and controlled by Allied forces. The War Department further directed that no public declaration was to be made on the status of the German armed forces. (Smith p. 93)
  3. ^ ICRC Commentaries on the Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War Article 5 "One category of military personnel which was refused the advantages of the Convention in the course of the Second World War comprised German and Japanese troops who fell into enemy hands on the capitulation of their countries in 1945 (6). The German capitulation was both political, involving the dissolution of the Government, and military whereas the Japanese capitulation was only military. Moreover, the situation was different since Germany was a party to the 1929 Convention and Japan was not. Nevertheless, the German and Japanese troops were considered as surrendered enemy personnel and were deprived of the protection provided by the 1929 Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. The Allied authorities took the view that unconditional surrender amounted to giving a free hand to the Detaining Powers as to the treatment they might give to military personnel who fell into their hands following the capitulation. In fact, these men were frequently in a very different situation from that of their comrades who had been taken prisoner during the hostilities, since very often they had not even gone into [p.76] action against the enemy. Although on the whole the treatment given to surrendered enemy personnel was fairly favourable, it presented certain disadvantages: prisoners in this category had their personal property impounded without any receipt being given; they had no spokesman to represent them before the Detaining Power; officers received no pay and other ranks, although compelled to work, got no wages; in any penal proceedings they had the benefit of none of the guarantees provided by the Convention. Most important of all, these men had no legal status and were at the entire mercy of the victor. Fortunately, they were well treated but this is no reason to overlook the fact that they were deprived of any status and all guarantees."
  4. ^ a b c d e Bischoff & Ambrose 1992, p. 9
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Bischoff & Ambrose 1992, p. 11
  6. ^ a b Farquharson 1985, pp. 16, 28–29, 252
  7. ^ a b c d Farquharson 1985, pp. 1–29, 44–60, 252
  8. ^ a b c d Bischoff & Ambrose 1992, p. 7
  9. ^ Farquharson 1985, p. 25
  10. ^ a b Bischoff & Ambrose 1992, p. 2
  11. ^ Marrus 1985, pp. 283–313
  12. ^ a b Bischoff & Ambrose 1992, p. 4
  13. ^ a b c Bischoff & Ambrose 1992, p. 12
  14. ^ a b Tent 1992, p. 199
  15. ^ Tent 1992, p. 100
  16. ^ ICRC in WW II: German prisoners of war in Allied hands International Red Cross 2 February 2005
  17. ^ Balabkins, Nicholas (1964). Germany under direct controls: economic aspects of industrial disarmament, 1945–1948. Rutgers University Press. pp. 113–125. ISBN 978-0-8135-0449-0. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
  18. ^ Overmans 1992, p. 144
  19. ^ a b c Bischoff & Ambrose 1992, p. 5
  20. ^ Ratza 1973, pp. 54, 173–185
  21. ^ Overmans 1992, p. 146
  22. ^ Bischoff 1992, p. 217
  23. ^ a b c d Overmans 1992, p. 147
  24. ^ a b c Bischoff & Ambrose 1992, p. 6
  25. ^ Ziemke 1990, p. 291
  26. ^ a b c Villa 1992, p. 58
  27. ^ a b c Villa 1992, p. 57
  28. ^ Department of State 1966, pp. 172, 191–192, 210
  29. ^ Villa 1992, p. 59
  30. ^ a b c Villa 1992, p. 60
  31. ^ a b c d Villa 1992, p. 62
  32. ^ a b Villa 1992, p. 63
  33. ^ a b Villa 1992, p. 61
  34. ^ Villa 1992, p. 64
  35. ^ United States Department of State / Foreign relations of the United States : diplomatic papers : the Conference of Berlin (the Potsdam Conference), 1945 Volume II (1945) p. 765
  36. ^ a b c d e S. P. MacKenzie "The Treatment of Prisoners of War in World War II", The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 66, No. 3. (Sep., 1994), pp. 487-520.
  37. ^ ICRC Commentaries on the Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War Article 5 "One category of military personnel which was refused the advantages of the Convention in the course of the Second World War comprised German and Japanese troops who fell into enemy hands on the capitulation of their countries in 1945 (6). The German capitulation was both political, involving the dissolution of the Government, and military, whereas the Japanese capitulation was only military. Moreover, the situation was different since Germany was a party to the 1929 Convention and Japan was not. Nevertheless, the German and Japanese troops were considered as surrendered enemy personnel and were deprived of the protection provided by the 1929 Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War."
  38. ^ ICRC Commentaries on the Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War Article 5 "Under the present provision, the Convention applies to persons who "fall into the power" of the enemy. This term is also used in the opening sentence of Article 4, replacing the expression "captured" which was used in the 1929 Convention (Article 1). It indicates clearly that the treatment laid down by the Convention is applicable not only to military personnel taken prisoner in the course of fighting, but also to those who fall into the hands of the adversary following surrender or mass capitulation."
  39. ^ stern-Serie: Besiegt, befreit, besetzt – Deutschland 1945–48
  40. ^ Further referenced in footnote to: J. Wilhelm, Can the Status of Prisoners of War Be Altered? (Geneva, 1953) p.10
  41. ^ O'Reilly, Charles T. (2001). Forgotten Battles : Italy's War of Liberation, 1943-1945. Lanham: Lexington Books. p. 68. ISBN 0739101951.
  42. ^ Plato, Alexander von; Leh, Almut; Thonfeld, Christoph, eds. (2010). Hitler's Slaves Life Stories of Forced Labourers in Nazi-Occupied Europe. New York: Berghahn Books, Inc. p. 5. ISBN 978-1845459901.
  43. ^ Crew, David, ed. (2012). Nazism and German Society, 1933-1945. Routledge. p. 232. ISBN 978-1134891078.
  44. ^ Note: Captive Italian nationals who were not designated as prisoner of war were alternatively also designated as "personnel in custody of the Government of the United States of America and its agencies". An alternative name given was also Italian surrendered enemy personnel.

References

[edit]

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]
  • France's Deadly Mine-Clearing Missions Surviving German POWs Seek Compensation. Georg B?nisch, Der Spiegel Online, international edition August 25, 2008.
  • Germans forced to run across minefields ("Tvang tyskere til ? l?pe over minefelt") Video Extract from Norwegian documentary on Germans forced to clear minefields in Norway. Note: German protests that forcing POWs to clear mines was against international law, article 32 of the Geneva conventions, were rejected with the assertion that the Germans were not POWs; they were disarmed forces who had surrendered unconditionally ("avv?pnede styrker som hadde overgitt seg betingelsesl?st"). Mine clearance reports received by the Allied Forces Headquarters state: June 21, 1945; 199 dead and 163 wounded Germans; 3 Norwegians and 4 British wounded. The last registration, from August 29, 1945, lists 392 wounded and 275 dead Germans. Mine-clearance was then for unknown reasons halted for close to a year before recommencing under better conditions during June–September 1946. This time many volunteered thanks to good pay, and death rates were much lower, possibly in part thanks to a deal permitting them medical treatment at Norwegian hospitals. Jonas Tjersland, Tyske soldater brukt som mineryddere VG, 08-04-2006.
常熟有什么好玩的地方 女人小腹痛什么原因 心肌损伤是什么意思 gc是什么 农历五月初五是什么星座
50年属什么生肖 外贸原单是什么意思 什么叫肺部纤维灶 龙和什么属相最配 不自觉摇头是什么病
口腔溃疡喝什么水 阴囊潮湿吃什么 吃黄体酮有什么副作用 不想吃油腻的东西是什么原因 左眼跳代表什么
前期怀孕有什么症状 优势卵泡是什么意思 舌头上有白苔是什么原因 盐卤是什么 单元剧是什么意思
空调室内机漏水是什么原因hcv8jop2ns8r.cn 93什么意思hcv9jop8ns2r.cn daks是什么品牌hcv8jop1ns5r.cn 夜间睡觉口干口苦是什么原因hcv7jop5ns3r.cn 打一个喷嚏代表什么意思hcv8jop9ns9r.cn
烤瓷牙和全瓷牙有什么区别tiangongnft.com 丝状疣用什么药hcv9jop0ns1r.cn 午夜梦回是什么意思hcv7jop4ns8r.cn 吃什么东西减肥最快xjhesheng.com 称中药的小秤叫什么hcv7jop5ns3r.cn
梦见家里好多蛇是什么预兆hcv9jop2ns2r.cn 猫能吃什么人吃的东西hcv9jop4ns3r.cn 尿频尿黄是什么原因hcv7jop9ns1r.cn 尿酸高是什么引起的hcv8jop4ns7r.cn 仓鼠能吃什么水果xinjiangjialails.com
发烧骨头疼是什么原因hcv8jop7ns1r.cn 不到长城非好汉的下一句是什么helloaicloud.com 宝宝拉肚子吃什么药好得快hcv9jop0ns8r.cn 1952属什么生肖liaochangning.com 双子女喜欢什么样的男生hcv7jop4ns8r.cn
百度